ePOP Concept
Material handling

BEV Street Cleaner Electric vs. Hydraulic Brush Motors

11 Dec 2025

10 min read

Content:
Content:
text

Background

A BEV street cleaner uses hydraulic motors for the brushes that are shared with a legacy ICE cleaner.  The municipal customer is asking the OEM if it is worth it to switch to electric motors for these brushes on future orders.  

Project Objective

Determine the payback period for investing in electric brush motors for the main and gutter brushes.

ePOP Approach

Model the existing hydraulic configuration and compare it to individual electric motors configuration.  

ePOP Outcome Delivered

Switching to electric motors actually has an immediate payback.  The overall cost of motors ges down because the electric motor used to power the hydraulic pump is able to be downsized.  The efficiency gains of the electric motor allows for a smaller battery, which was not even initially considered.

{{result}}

Hydraulic brush motor configuration
Electric brush configuration
The electric brush motor option has a TCO advantage from day 1 due to hydraulic pump motor and battery downsizing
14%

Initial Cost Reduction

11%

TCO Cost Reduction

10%

Reduction in Battery Size

Vehicle
Official figures
Energy
Consumption [kWh / 100 km]
Range [km]
ePOP Virtual reference
Energy
Consumption [kWh / 100 km]
Range [km]
Range Delta [%]
Audi SQ6 e-tron Edition One AWD 2024
16.9
560
16.7
569
+1.6
BYD Seal Excellence AWD 2023
15.9
520
16.0
514
-1.2
Tesla Model Y Standard Range RWD 2023
13.3
430
13.7
416
-3.3
XPENG G6 755 Pro RWD 2023
15.4
570
15.2
577
+0.9