ePOP Concept
Material handling

Increasing Forklift Capability without increasing ICE size

05 Jan 2026

5 min read

Content:
Content:
text

Background

A forklift OEM wants to increase the largest forklift they offer by 20%. The OEM wants to stay with the same diesel engine supplier; however, they are already using the largest ICE offered. The OEM wants to know if it makes sense to increase the power necessary with a hybrid before considering a different ICE supplier.

Project Objective

Determine if a hybrid powertrain makes TCO and initial cost sense. Optimizing for TCO, determine what battery size should be used. Determine the initial cost difference between a hybrid and increased ICE only.

ePOP Approach

Increase the application function power cycles by 20% over the existing model. Limit the ICE component size to the largest from the preferred supplier. Consider multiple hybrid configurations and technologies.

ePOP Outcome Delivered

Adding an electric motor parallel to the existing ICE configuration is possible at a 7% increase in initial cost while maintaining similar TCO. A non-plugin series hybrid configuration with eAxle could reduce 7 year TCO by 15% with a 7% increase in initial cost. Optimum ICE size is actually smaller than the existing large ICE. Optiman battery size is 16kWh. A plugin version would reduce TCO another 2%.

Scale the power up to the new application using the function cycles.
Series eAxle configuration reduces TCO significantly over parallel hydraulic drive version.
TCO reduction of 17% is possible with plugin version.
17%

TCO Reduction

<1

Year breakeven cost

50%

Reduction in ICE size

Vehicle
Official figures
Energy
Consumption [kWh / 100 km]
Range [km]
ePOP Virtual reference
Energy
Consumption [kWh / 100 km]
Range [km]
Range Delta [%]
Audi SQ6 e-tron Edition One AWD 2024
16.9
560
16.7
569
+1.6
BYD Seal Excellence AWD 2023
15.9
520
16.0
514
-1.2
Tesla Model Y Standard Range RWD 2023
13.3
430
13.7
416
-3.3
XPENG G6 755 Pro RWD 2023
15.4
570
15.2
577
+0.9